Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[doc beta] ember-views & ember-glimmer rfc176 & doc updates #16168

Conversation

Parrryy
Copy link
Contributor

@Parrryy Parrryy commented Jan 23, 2018

PR for #15723 for following packages:

  • ember-views
  • ember-glimmer

Couldn't find a replacement for Ember.EventDispatcher, let me know if there is one so I can change it.

@toddjordan
Copy link
Contributor

You're good. EventDispatcher still gets namespaced with E ber

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ import { String as StringUtils } from 'ember-runtime';
</div>
```

See [Ember.String.loc](/api/classes/Ember.String.html#method_loc) for how to
See [Ember.String.loc](/api/ember/release/classes/String/methods/loc?anchor=loc) for how to
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change from Ember.String.loc to String.loc

@toddjordan
Copy link
Contributor

@Parrryy thanks!

Now it just looks like all that's left is to rebase in the latest master to get rid of the conflict, then squash the files and prepend [doc beta]. let me know if you need help

wycats and others added 2 commits January 29, 2018 17:23
Assert for forgetting .get() on an Ember proxy

updated to new release links and some rfc176 doc updates
@Parrryy Parrryy force-pushed the ember-views-and-glimmer-package-doc-update branch from 2cde57e to ca26163 Compare January 29, 2018 17:25
@Parrryy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Parrryy commented Jan 29, 2018

The first time, rebasing and had lots of issues so made a new branch and PR. It won't happen again, sorry.

@Parrryy Parrryy closed this Jan 29, 2018
@Parrryy Parrryy deleted the ember-views-and-glimmer-package-doc-update branch January 29, 2018 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants